Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement Laws had given. ¶11 To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161800 - 2017-09-21
statement Laws had given. ¶11 To establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relied on confidential informant statements; and (5) Lopez’s staff advocate refused to obtain evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80374 - 2014-09-15
relied on confidential informant statements; and (5) Lopez’s staff advocate refused to obtain evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80374 - 2014-09-15
State v. Raymond D. Shaw
wounds. Shaw claimed in a statement to the police that M.B. was the shooter. M.B. claimed that Shaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11726 - 2005-03-31
wounds. Shaw claimed in a statement to the police that M.B. was the shooter. M.B. claimed that Shaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11726 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of conviction for second-degree intentional homicide after a plea of guilty.[1] This case involves statements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80376 - 2012-06-21
of conviction for second-degree intentional homicide after a plea of guilty.[1] This case involves statements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80376 - 2012-06-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a defendant’s statement. WIS. STAT. § 971.31(10) (2013-14); County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d 431, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
of a defendant’s statement. WIS. STAT. § 971.31(10) (2013-14); County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d 431, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for allowing documents to be sent to the jury “that contained highly prejudicial statements.” Scott, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14
for allowing documents to be sent to the jury “that contained highly prejudicial statements.” Scott, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
State v. George L. Jones
motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have been suppressed by the trial court because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21
motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have been suppressed by the trial court because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew Newson
of Newson’s written statement that was presented to the jury. We reject Newson’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05
of Newson’s written statement that was presented to the jury. We reject Newson’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05
State v. Fairly W. Earls
through both the testimony of the social worker, and her statements in the videotaped interview with J.M.O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31
through both the testimony of the social worker, and her statements in the videotaped interview with J.M.O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31
Steven D. Kinney (Deceased) v. Stempers I-94 Shell, Inc.
on statements given to police by Steven's murderers. We conclude there was no error in LIRC's consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8215 - 2005-03-31
on statements given to police by Steven's murderers. We conclude there was no error in LIRC's consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8215 - 2005-03-31