Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 38676 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Mastella L. Jackson - 2014AP002238
statements to police while in custody, both before and after receiving Miranda[1] warnings. Some of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141620 - 2015-06-23

[PDF] State v. Gerrod R. Bell - 2015AP002668
to eliminate references to statements by the 14-year-old alleged victim that she had “never had sex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180580 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. George L. Jones - 1999AP003286
motion. Jones claims: (1) his statements should have been suppressed by the trial court because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16320 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Billy Joe Cannon - 2013AP002858
custodial statements to police. We turn to that contention. ¶11 During pretrial proceedings, Cannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21

State v. Andrew Newson - 2004AP002006
of Newson’s written statement that was presented to the jury. We reject Newson’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05

[PDF] Oneida County Department of Social Services v. Scott H. - 2011AP002599
highly prejudicial statements.” Scott, in his statement of facts, highlights seventeen statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82482 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Johnny Jerome Jones - 2014AP000342
of a defendant’s statement. WIS. STAT. § 971.31(10) (2013-14); County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d 431, 434
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21

Oneida County Department of Social Services v. Scott H. - 2011AP002599
for allowing documents to be sent to the jury “that contained highly prejudicial statements.” Scott, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82482 - 2012-05-14

[PDF] Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank - 2004AP002865
to obtain witness statements. Aguilar acknowledges, however, that there is no set deadline for filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21

Steven D. Kinney (Deceased) v. Stempers I-94 Shell, Inc. - 1994AP002843
on statements given to police by Steven's murderers. We conclude there was no error in LIRC's consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8215 - 2005-03-31