Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1261 - 1270 of 37225 for affidavit of mailing.

Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections - 1994AP002484
which stamps every inmate's outgoing correspondence--"THIS LETTER HAS BEEN MAILED FROM THE WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, there was “[r]eturn of unclaimed/undelivered mail service notice of hearing of plaintiff William Frederick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30751 - 2007-10-31

[PDF] William F. Williams v. Capitol Motel - 2007AP000424
also indicates that on March 21, 2005, there was “[r]eturn of unclaimed/undelivered mail service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30751 - 2014-09-15

Donald R. Kustelski v. Robin L. Taylor - 2002AP002786
. Not until June 3, however, did she provide mail service to Kustelski, who did not receive Taylor’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5789 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Spangler - 2014AP002633
, 2007, Attorney Spangler emailed F.B. saying he had received a voice mail message from F.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171474 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donald R. Kustelski v. Robin L. Taylor - 2002AP002786
. Not until June 3, however, did she provide mail service to Kustelski, who did not receive Taylor’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Richard G. Pool v. City of Sheboygan - 2005AP002028
. No. 2005AP2028 2 served on the claimant by registered or certified mail. The statute is plain on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25002 - 2017-09-21

Richard G. Pool v. City of Sheboygan - 2005AP002028
mail. The statute is plain on its face, and there are policy reasons why we should hold governmental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25002 - 2006-06-27

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Elizabeth A. Cavendish-Sosinski - 2003AP001697
was served by mail on Cavendish-Sosinski at her last known address. Again, she did not respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16792 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Keith Coburn v. Office of the Commissioner of Railroads - 2015AP000173
, which requires that a petition for judicial review be served “personally or by certified mail upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144465 - 2017-09-21