Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 17953 for inmates search.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 17953 for inmates search.
State v. Ramiah A. Whiteside - 1995AP003458
. Thus, a trial court's parole recommendation will ultimately be found in an inmate's prison file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10106 - 2005-03-31
. Thus, a trial court's parole recommendation will ultimately be found in an inmate's prison file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Claudia R. Cody v. Dane County - 2000AP000549
of La Crosse v. Elsen, 128 Wis. 2d 508, 512, 383 N.W.2d 916 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶3 Cody was an inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2321 - 2017-09-19
of La Crosse v. Elsen, 128 Wis. 2d 508, 512, 383 N.W.2d 916 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶3 Cody was an inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2321 - 2017-09-19
Claudia R. Cody v. Dane County - 2000AP000549
Wis. 2d 508, 512, 383 N.W.2d 916 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶3 Cody was an inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2321 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 508, 512, 383 N.W.2d 916 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶3 Cody was an inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lori B. v. Steven B. - 1998AP003011
inmate to kill Lori. Prior to the trial, Steven filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21
inmate to kill Lori. Prior to the trial, Steven filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Juanita A. Acker - 2021AP000385
suppression motion. Acker sought to suppress evidence found when police executed a search warrant at her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
suppression motion. Acker sought to suppress evidence found when police executed a search warrant at her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 302.113(9)(am). Following the inmate’s return to confinement, the DOC also recalculates his or her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
. § 302.113(9)(am). Following the inmate’s return to confinement, the DOC also recalculates his or her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 302.113(9)(am). Following the inmate’s return to confinement, the DOC also recalculates his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
. § 302.113(9)(am). Following the inmate’s return to confinement, the DOC also recalculates his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806515 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
State v. Walter F. Cline - 1999AP002560
then spoke with an inmate who claimed to have seen Cline peeping into the bathroom, and to have heard Cline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16045 - 2017-09-21
then spoke with an inmate who claimed to have seen Cline peeping into the bathroom, and to have heard Cline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16045 - 2017-09-21
State v. Malcolm A. Butler - 2012AP002243
. § 971.11 (2011-12),[1] requires that a case be brought on for trial within 120 days of an inmate’s request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28
. § 971.11 (2011-12),[1] requires that a case be brought on for trial within 120 days of an inmate’s request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105578 - 2014-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Malcolm A. Butler - 2012AP002243
that a case be brought on for trial within 120 days of an inmate’s request for prompt disposition, “subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105578 - 2017-09-21
that a case be brought on for trial within 120 days of an inmate’s request for prompt disposition, “subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105578 - 2017-09-21