Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12491 - 12500 of 38674 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12491 - 12500 of 38674 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Ladarius Marshall - 2012AP000140
: “[A]re you now willing to answer questions or make a statement?” Marshall answered: “I don’t want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
: “[A]re you now willing to answer questions or make a statement?” Marshall answered: “I don’t want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
State v. Ladarius Marshall - 2012AP000140
a statement?” Marshall answered: “I don’t want to make no statement. I’ll answer some questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
a statement?” Marshall answered: “I don’t want to make no statement. I’ll answer some questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
a motion to suppress Hampton’s inculpatory statements to police during an in- custody interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841113 - 2024-08-22
a motion to suppress Hampton’s inculpatory statements to police during an in- custody interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841113 - 2024-08-22
State v. Joseph F. Jiles - 2002AP000153
signed. ¶3 In due course, Jiles moved to suppress his statements. He claimed that: (1) he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16585 - 2005-03-31
signed. ¶3 In due course, Jiles moved to suppress his statements. He claimed that: (1) he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16585 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ashley S. - 1999AP001157
prior consistent statements, and by excluding evidence of an alternative source of the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15464 - 2005-03-31
prior consistent statements, and by excluding evidence of an alternative source of the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Hamilton - 1998AP001852
to impeach her credibility through the use of prior inconsistent statements; and (2) that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14204 - 2014-09-15
to impeach her credibility through the use of prior inconsistent statements; and (2) that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14204 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Hamilton - 1998AP001852
attempt to impeach her credibility through the use of prior inconsistent statements; and (2) that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14204 - 2005-03-31
attempt to impeach her credibility through the use of prior inconsistent statements; and (2) that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Forney - 2016AP000250
in response. First, Forney’s statement was ambiguous and therefore did not require the officer to stop
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195292 - 2017-09-21
in response. First, Forney’s statement was ambiguous and therefore did not require the officer to stop
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195292 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Aretus S. Fenn - 1997AP003660
) in admitting the statements of the victim’s No. 97-3660-CR 2 four-year-old daughter under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
) in admitting the statements of the victim’s No. 97-3660-CR 2 four-year-old daughter under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
State v. Aretus S. Fenn - 1997AP003660
) in admitting the statements of the victim’s four-year-old daughter under the excited utterance hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13401 - 2005-03-31
) in admitting the statements of the victim’s four-year-old daughter under the excited utterance hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13401 - 2005-03-31