Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12491 - 12500 of 44421 for adult name change.

[PDF] State v. B. H. - 2016AP000892
, clothing, appropriate shelter, medical and dental care, education, and appropriate adult supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181724 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] J. G. v. Deborah S. Wangard - 2006AP000818
separated. Deborah and Steven Wangard will be referred to individually by first name and collectively
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33435 - 2014-09-15

Joseph C. Mrazek, Sr. v. First Bank Southeast, N.A. - 1996AP001961
hearing postverdict motions, the trial court changed the jury’s answer to the breach question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11085 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Joseph C. Mrazek, Sr. v. First Bank Southeast, N.A. - 1996AP001961
court changed the jury’s answer to the breach question and scheduled a second trial on the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11085 - 2017-09-19

State v. Emmett White - 1996AP000628
where the homicides occurred. Martin, who initially gave the police a false name, told the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10472 - 2005-03-31

State v. Louis J. Thornton - 2001AP000727
[sic] that my appointed appellate counsel, [name of counsel], seek to withdraw as my attorney in Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3733 - 2005-03-31

State v. Louis J. Thornton - 2001AP000726
[sic] that my appointed appellate counsel, [name of counsel], seek to withdraw as my attorney in Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3732 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerry J. DeKeyser - 1998AP000174
, such arguments seem permissible and do relate to a fact or proposition of consequence; namely, that the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13539 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jerry J. DeKeyser - 1998AP000174
seem permissible and do relate to a fact or proposition of consequence; namely, that the act occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13539 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
justifications are: (1) the law has changed in a way that undermines the prior decision's rationale; (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822535 - 2024-09-09