Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12421 - 12430 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12421 - 12430 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett - 1994AP002487
court to grant a new trial; (2) the trial court erred by concluding that a hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8118 - 2017-09-19
court to grant a new trial; (2) the trial court erred by concluding that a hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8118 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett - 1994AP001801
court to grant a new trial; (2) the trial court erred by concluding that a hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7951 - 2017-09-19
court to grant a new trial; (2) the trial court erred by concluding that a hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7951 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Henry D. Weston - 2016AP002347
statements to police, which Weston claims were involuntary. For the reasons set forth below, we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210391 - 2018-03-29
statements to police, which Weston claims were involuntary. For the reasons set forth below, we reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210391 - 2018-03-29
[PDF]
State v. Ulanda M. Green - 2018AP001350
in denying Green’s motion to suppress inculpatory statements she made to a law enforcement officer while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
in denying Green’s motion to suppress inculpatory statements she made to a law enforcement officer while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
State v. Roberto V. Rodriguez - 2005AP001265
house. Additionally, Rodriguez’s trial lawyer asked the officer: Q. And you believe that her statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26019 - 2006-08-29
house. Additionally, Rodriguez’s trial lawyer asked the officer: Q. And you believe that her statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26019 - 2006-08-29
State v. Lamont Williams - 1995AP002860
challenges the trial court's ruling that excluded a statement allegedly implicating another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9834 - 2005-03-31
challenges the trial court's ruling that excluded a statement allegedly implicating another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lamont Williams - 1995AP002860
that excluded a statement allegedly implicating another person as the robber. Finally, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9834 - 2017-09-19
that excluded a statement allegedly implicating another person as the robber. Finally, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9834 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Marcus D. Williams - 2015AP001089
and acknowledgment of the Miranda 3 warnings, Williams made inculpatory statements, which will be discussed below
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175783 - 2017-09-21
and acknowledgment of the Miranda 3 warnings, Williams made inculpatory statements, which will be discussed below
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175783 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Earnest Lee Nicholson - 2015AP002154
joined for trial. The Trial ¶6 Prior to trial, the State filed a motion to admit statements M.D.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185789 - 2017-09-21
joined for trial. The Trial ¶6 Prior to trial, the State filed a motion to admit statements M.D.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185789 - 2017-09-21
State v. Barry D. Stamps - 2004AP000206
hearsay statements were admitted against him in violation of the Confrontation Clause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7256 - 2005-03-31
hearsay statements were admitted against him in violation of the Confrontation Clause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7256 - 2005-03-31