Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12401 - 12410 of 66976 for had.

State v. One 1997 Ford F-150 - 2002AP002685
of the truck had not yet been adjudicated. The court granted the adjournment. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bryan J. Landwehr - 2016AP002536
that caused Klieforth to suspect the two might have had an altercation or were involved in a domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201515 - 2017-11-07

Brian Thomas v. Robert D. Pringle, Jr. - 2006AP000697
the Pringles to recover a $2364.39 tax penalty assessed against him under Wis. Stat. § 74.485 when land he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26832 - 2006-10-17

[PDF] State v. Brandon T. Holtz - 2005AP000570
Holtz’s conduct since the September 6, 2003 incident, informing the court that Holtz had been late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27613 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Mark H. Lindert - 2006AP003059
questions. Lindert, apparently uninjured, stated that he had stopped at a bar before the accident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Scott Elvers - 2003AP002637
that they had reached the following plea agreement. Elvers would enter a plea of guilty to the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nicholas Leair - 2002AP000002
and McElroy’s testimony. During direct examination, McElroy said he had not received anything in return for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nicholas Leair - 2002AP000002
testimony. During direct examination, McElroy said he had not received anything in return for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4782 - 2017-09-19

Ramesh Kapur v. Rohit Sharma - 2005AP002031
, Kapur and Saini commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that Sharma had taken “improper and unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20267 - 2005-11-15

[PDF] Ramesh Kapur v. Rohit Sharma - 2005AP002031
. As a result, Kapur and Saini commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that Sharma had taken “improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20267 - 2017-09-21