Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12381 - 12390 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Morris F. Clement - 2002AP003319
was based in part on a written statement by Clement’s probation agent: “[a] statement by Agent Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5969 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peggy Sue Lockett - 1994AP002487
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peggy Sue Lockett - 1994AP001801
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis D. Lemoine - 2010AP002597
of the court of appeals[1] that affirmed the judgment of the circuit court. This case involves statements made
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91350 - 2013-01-07

[PDF] State v. Dennis D. Lemoine - 2010AP002597
court. This case involves statements made during what was undisputedly a non-custodial interrogation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91350 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Norman L. Dismuke - 2002AP002164
that: (1) his three statements were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights; (2) the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5551 - 2017-09-19

State v. Norman L. Dismuke - 2002AP002164
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] On appeal, he argues that: (1) his three statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5551 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gregory L. Shade - 2001AP003317
counsel’s testimony concerning his theory of defense was consistent with his opening and closing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4684 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gregory L. Shade - 2001AP003317
opening and closing statements at trial. ¶4 Shade raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4684 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Eric L. Hill - 2015AP001236
] off the record.” He said he “d[id] not want to make a statement until a lawyer was present,” but he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175685 - 2017-09-21