Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 18901 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 12291 - 12300 of 18901 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
State v. John E. Paul - 2017AP000109
. The circuit court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, finding that the affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22
. The circuit court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, finding that the affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Anthawn S. Williams - 2012AP001142
collected in a no-knock entry because the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96370 - 2014-09-15
collected in a no-knock entry because the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96370 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Wayne Zeman v. Sarah Nicole Zeman - 2014AP001935
relief. In an affidavit in support of his motion seeking relief, Mark stated that he had believed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21
relief. In an affidavit in support of his motion seeking relief, Mark stated that he had believed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kristine A. Peshek - 2011AP000909
and affidavit admitting the facts of the misconduct. On February 26, 2010, at a hearing before the Illinois
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66464 - 2011-06-23
and affidavit admitting the facts of the misconduct. On February 26, 2010, at a hearing before the Illinois
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66464 - 2011-06-23
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Earl A. Charlton - 1987AP001021
for misconduct for less than six months shall be reinstated by the supreme court upon the filing of an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16847 - 2005-03-31
for misconduct for less than six months shall be reinstated by the supreme court upon the filing of an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16847 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2023
. His appointed counsel submitted an affidavit in support of the motion explaining why the request
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714565 - 2023-10-10
. His appointed counsel submitted an affidavit in support of the motion explaining why the request
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714565 - 2023-10-10
03-06 Supplemental Order - Repeal of Wis. Stats. ss. 802.05 and 814.025, and adoption of Rule 11 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in lieu thereof as amended Wis. Stat. s. 802.05 (Effective 07-01-05)
to the filing of an affidavit under this section. Note: Amends cross-reference in accordance with the repeal
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18689 - 2005-06-20
to the filing of an affidavit under this section. Note: Amends cross-reference in accordance with the repeal
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18689 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
03-06 Supplemental Order - Repeal of Wis. Stats. ss. 802.05 and 814.025, and adoption of Rule 11 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in lieu thereof as amended Wis. Stat. s. 802.05 (Effective 07-01-05)
to the filing of an affidavit under this section. NOTE: Amends cross-reference in accordance with the repeal
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18689 - 2017-09-21
to the filing of an affidavit under this section. NOTE: Amends cross-reference in accordance with the repeal
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jevon Jones Jaconi - 2003AP002039
provided no proof that he filed an affidavit of compliance as required by that rule. ¶6 The referee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123369 - 2017-09-21
provided no proof that he filed an affidavit of compliance as required by that rule. ¶6 The referee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” and was not a “legal brief,” that it did not include an affidavit, and that Smith had “not come forward to further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09
” and was not a “legal brief,” that it did not include an affidavit, and that Smith had “not come forward to further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09