Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12241 - 12250 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12241 - 12250 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Robert E. Tucker - 2001AP003444
statements that he gave to the police because, he claims, the statements were tainted by his allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
statements that he gave to the police because, he claims, the statements were tainted by his allegedly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. P. H. - 2021AP000542
statements “upon oath or affirmation,” or affirm that she understood “that false statements are punishable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677967 - 2023-07-11
statements “upon oath or affirmation,” or affirm that she understood “that false statements are punishable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677967 - 2023-07-11
State v. Francisco L. Mendez - 2011AP000158
(OWI).[1] Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because unrecorded statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74020 - 2011-11-22
(OWI).[1] Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because unrecorded statements made by him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74020 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Francisco L. Mendez - 2011AP000158
unrecorded statements made by him at the hospital, where he was taken for a blood draw after his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
unrecorded statements made by him at the hospital, where he was taken for a blood draw after his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Frisch - 2012AP000205
No. 2012AP205-CR 2 statements made by an anonymous informant. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15
No. 2012AP205-CR 2 statements made by an anonymous informant. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel W. Frisch - 2012AP000205
on the admission at trial of the investigating officer’s testimony about out-of-court statements made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03
on the admission at trial of the investigating officer’s testimony about out-of-court statements made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94977 - 2013-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Demetrius Johnson - 1999AP001468
statements made by Hall to Johnson or to her during the transaction. To counter the inculpatory effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15600 - 2017-09-21
statements made by Hall to Johnson or to her during the transaction. To counter the inculpatory effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15600 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thermond Larry III - 1997AP002624
a false statement and material omissions. He also contends that the trial court erred by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
a false statement and material omissions. He also contends that the trial court erred by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott D. Dahlen - 1999AP002204
after he made a series of statements to law enforcement officers. He was convicted after trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15907 - 2017-09-21
after he made a series of statements to law enforcement officers. He was convicted after trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15907 - 2017-09-21
State v. Heather A. Markwardt - 2006AP002871
through enough today.” The circuit court held that this statement was an unequivocal announcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30711 - 2007-11-27
through enough today.” The circuit court held that this statement was an unequivocal announcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30711 - 2007-11-27