Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 66215 for did.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 66215 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Brian Mallory - 2003AP001723
and did not inform him of his right to file the petition pro se. We affirm. ¶2 Mallory’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6629 - 2017-09-19
and did not inform him of his right to file the petition pro se. We affirm. ¶2 Mallory’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6629 - 2017-09-19
Timmy L. Jordan v. Hooters of America LLC - 2013AP000627
held a status conference on December 19, 2012. Jordan appeared, but Hooters did not. The court set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110285 - 2014-04-09
held a status conference on December 19, 2012. Jordan appeared, but Hooters did not. The court set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110285 - 2014-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Kieffer L. Michel - 2016AP000110
that in fact the defendant did not know or understand the information that should have been provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175697 - 2017-09-21
that in fact the defendant did not know or understand the information that should have been provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175697 - 2017-09-21
State v. Aaron J. Lindh - 2000AP000991
to testify. We conclude that the court did not err, and we affirm. ¶2 Lindh’s trial focused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2487 - 2005-03-31
to testify. We conclude that the court did not err, and we affirm. ¶2 Lindh’s trial focused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2487 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marquel A. Harris - 2009AP000250
revocation of his extended supervision. He argues that the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44875 - 2014-09-15
revocation of his extended supervision. He argues that the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44875 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marquel A. Harris - 2009AP000250
him after revocation of his extended supervision. He argues that the circuit court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44875 - 2009-12-21
him after revocation of his extended supervision. He argues that the circuit court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44875 - 2009-12-21
State v. James J. Kilian - 2012AP001404
attorney did not object to these errors at sentencing; (5) that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96439 - 2013-05-06
attorney did not object to these errors at sentencing; (5) that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96439 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
State v. James J. Kilian - 2012AP001404
because his attorney did not object to these errors at sentencing; (5) that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96439 - 2014-09-15
because his attorney did not object to these errors at sentencing; (5) that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96439 - 2014-09-15
Carey A. Molinski v. Chase Auto Finance Corporation - 2012AP002184
burden to prove that Chase did not have the right to repossess her car without a court hearing. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99436 - 2013-08-29
burden to prove that Chase did not have the right to repossess her car without a court hearing. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99436 - 2013-08-29
[PDF]
Carey A. Molinski v. Chase Auto Finance Corporation - 2012AP002184
that Chase did not have the right to repossess her car without a court hearing. ¶2 Molinski purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21
that Chase did not have the right to repossess her car without a court hearing. ¶2 Molinski purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21