Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12171 - 12180 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12171 - 12180 of 38671 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin - 1998AP002421
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin - 1998AP002420
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
and withdraw his pleas.[1] He argues that the court erred in ruling that: (1) statements he made to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Moeck - 2003AP000002
statement in the third trial sufficient to warrant a mistrial, and therefore the fourth trial violated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18067 - 2017-09-21
statement in the third trial sufficient to warrant a mistrial, and therefore the fourth trial violated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18067 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jonathan Elam - 2009AP000920
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48635 - 2010-04-05
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48635 - 2010-04-05
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan Elam - 2009AP000920
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48635 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order suppressing an audiovisual statement of a child victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48635 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Kevin J. Cormican - 2020AP001895
testified. Cormican testified that Pollock’s statements that Cormican would automatically lose his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619783 - 2023-02-07
testified. Cormican testified that Pollock’s statements that Cormican would automatically lose his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619783 - 2023-02-07
State v. Stanley K. Bullock - 2013AP000453
] He also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress two statements made to police: one while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108162 - 2014-03-25
] He also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress two statements made to police: one while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108162 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Pha Vue - 2001AP000102
by: (1) determining that Vue’s statement was admissible even though it was taken after he had invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3491 - 2017-09-20
by: (1) determining that Vue’s statement was admissible even though it was taken after he had invoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3491 - 2017-09-20
State v. Pha Vue - 2001AP000102
of law by: (1) determining that Vue’s statement was admissible even though it was taken after he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3491 - 2005-03-31
of law by: (1) determining that Vue’s statement was admissible even though it was taken after he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3491 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eduardo R. - 2000AP000910
motion to suppress three statements he made to the police. E.R. also challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2451 - 2017-09-19
motion to suppress three statements he made to the police. E.R. also challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2451 - 2017-09-19