Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12051 - 12060 of 68964 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
also requested a new sentencing hearing. In support of plea withdrawal, Jones argued that his plea had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27379 - 2006-12-11

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Donald K. Kraemer
for having had his secretary sign and notarize a client's name on a notice of personal injury claim
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16952 - 2005-03-31

Gibbs v. Mews Companies, Inc.
. BACKGROUND In November 1994, Mews asked Attorney Chuck Magyera, who had represented Mews in numerous matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11769 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
computer was lawful because regardless of whether his estranged wife had authority to consent to the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17

COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation from a plea agreement.” Fuerst claimed in the affidavit that “[i]f I had known that my sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31019 - 2007-11-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on a day when school had been canceled due to inclement weather so that Grayson could play
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194410 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
only[2]—even though they were obtained by the officers through further questioning after Franklin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
only[2]—even though they were obtained by the officers through further questioning after Franklin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for Stroh Die Casting Company, Inc. The stated reason for the termination was that Bowen had violated work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102469 - 2013-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Schwefel had failed to file a proposed order within thirty days following the May 18 hearing, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71614 - 2014-09-15