Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12011 - 12020 of 67621 for had.
Search results 12011 - 12020 of 67621 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had an unlawful-use-of-a-telephone case from 2000. The prosecutor explained that, during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27
had an unlawful-use-of-a-telephone case from 2000. The prosecutor explained that, during voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. H. - 1997AP003179
in the no merit brief. One element of the sexual assault charge was that T. had not attained the age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13216 - 2017-09-21
in the no merit brief. One element of the sexual assault charge was that T. had not attained the age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13216 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert M. H. - 1997AP003179
charge was that T. had not attained the age of thirteen. It appears that the primary evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31
charge was that T. had not attained the age of thirteen. It appears that the primary evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John M. Rodriguez-Luis - 2008AP000009
denying his motion seeking to suppress. Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32858 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion seeking to suppress. Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32858 - 2014-09-15
State v. John M. Rodriguez-Luis - 2008AP000009
motion seeking to suppress. Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32858 - 2008-06-02
motion seeking to suppress. Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32858 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie M. - 2002AP000389
. testified at the bench trial that she had no face-to-face contact with Bianca from January 2000 until she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
. testified at the bench trial that she had no face-to-face contact with Bianca from January 2000 until she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marion Kay Smith v. Robert Joseph Smith - 2002AP002339
$448,446.50 in assets to Marion and $305,701.17 in assets to Robert. The court found that Robert had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5614 - 2017-09-19
$448,446.50 in assets to Marion and $305,701.17 in assets to Robert. The court found that Robert had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5614 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Delavago K. Moore - 2009AP001298
. No. 2009AP1298-CR 3 had not yet been transcribed; thus the trial court could not “intelligently evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52522 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2009AP1298-CR 3 had not yet been transcribed; thus the trial court could not “intelligently evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52522 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bobbie M. - 2002AP000389
trial that she had no face-to-face contact with Bianca from January 2000 until she was incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4931 - 2005-03-31
trial that she had no face-to-face contact with Bianca from January 2000 until she was incarcerated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Kvalo - 2003AP000198
is whether the officer had probable cause to arrest Kvalo. Because we conclude that he did, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
is whether the officer had probable cause to arrest Kvalo. Because we conclude that he did, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19