Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 121 - 130 of 492 for ot.

[PDF] November 2007 Table of Unpublished Opinions
or th is r ea so n m ay n ot b e ci te d in a ny c ou rt o f th is s ta te
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31178 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] September 2008 Table of Unpublished Opinions - August Releases
or th is r ea so n m ay n ot b e ci te d in a ny c ou rt o f th is s ta te
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34250 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] November 2009 Table of Unpublished Opinions - October Releases
or th is r ea so n m ay n ot b e ci te d in a ny c ou rt o f th is s ta te
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44699 - 2014-09-15

State v. David M. Beasley - 1994AP002601
]ot every error that conceivably could have influenced the outcome undermines the reliability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Darryl W. Clay - 2018AP001962
challenge arises from the plea-taking court’s failure to use magic words. “[N]ot all small deviations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513064 - 2022-04-27

[PDF] State v. B. D. H. - 2017AP002390
or the determination of a fact in issue,” and “(3) [n]ot based on scientific, technical, or other specialized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209386 - 2018-03-06

[PDF] Eric A. Nielsen v. Bridlewood Estates of Lake Geneva Condo Owners Assoc., Inc. - 2020AP001765
a key to the lock on the gate. Even without the lock, Nielsen testified that he could “[n]ot easily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609345 - 2023-01-11

[PDF] State v. John Edward Kraemer - 2004AP002075
was error, it was not significant enough to warrant a mistrial. We agree. “[N]ot all errors warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James O. Rasmussen - 2021AP000288
”; and (3) “[n]ot based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675234 - 2023-07-05

State v. John Edward Kraemer - 2004AP002075
that, while the testimony was error, it was not significant enough to warrant a mistrial. We agree. “[N]ot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16