Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11901 - 11910 of 44421 for adult name change.

[PDF] May 31, 2012
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83281 - 2014-09-15

Sarah Malone v. Joseph Fons - 1996AP003326
her the property. The Malones’s original complaint named only Garner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11725 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sarah Malone v. Joseph Fons - 1996AP003326
original complaint named only Garner, the owner of the dog, as a defendant. Later, the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11725 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Mared Industries, Inc. v. Alan Mansfield - 2003AP000097
Blade Warehouse, Inc., by naming "Mansfield individually and 'd/b/a' Diamond Blade Warehouse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16712 - 2017-09-21

Mared Industries, Inc. v. Alan Mansfield - 2003AP000097
at his abode with either a competent family member over the age of 14 or an adult currently residing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16712 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Arends - 2008AP000052
to § 980.075 and § 980.09 because my condition has changed since my initial commitment and I no longer meet
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51070 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel Arends - 2008AP000052
in particular, contained "facts from which a judge or jury may conclude his condition is changed." Id., ¶26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51070 - 2010-06-14

State v. Terry Griffith - 1998AP000931
authority to ask the passenger his name and date of birth. If the officer lacked lawful authority to pose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17384 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - January 2009
Osicka The Supreme Court calendar may change between the time you receive this synopsis
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35096 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Clayton W. Williams - 2011AP002868
argument is incorrect, namely, that, by its plain meaning, the statute requires a mandatory minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95356 - 2014-09-15