Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 39971 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present any evidence to counter a statement allegedly made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present any evidence to counter a statement allegedly made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
a statement allegedly No. 2006AP582-CR 2 made by Harris that could be construed as an admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
a statement allegedly No. 2006AP582-CR 2 made by Harris that could be construed as an admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 444, 447 (1966). He asserts the statements were not admissible because they were not inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57580 - 2014-09-15
, 444, 447 (1966). He asserts the statements were not admissible because they were not inconsistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57580 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the statements were not admissible because they were not inconsistent with his trial testimony. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57580 - 2010-12-08
the statements were not admissible because they were not inconsistent with his trial testimony. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57580 - 2010-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
a three-year-old girl. At trial, the victim’s father testified to statements she made immediately after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28734 - 2007-04-16
a three-year-old girl. At trial, the victim’s father testified to statements she made immediately after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28734 - 2007-04-16
State v. Robert L. Snider
-victim’s videotaped statement under the residual hearsay exception; (2) whether Snider’s counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31
-victim’s videotaped statement under the residual hearsay exception; (2) whether Snider’s counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Snider
. No. 02-1628-CR 2 precludes a trial court from admitting a child-victim’s videotaped statement under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5374 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-1628-CR 2 precludes a trial court from admitting a child-victim’s videotaped statement under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5374 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark Nelson
about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion for postconviction relief was denied by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion for postconviction relief was denied by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Nelson
, and that the court should have excluded evidence about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
, and that the court should have excluded evidence about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
October 3, 2003 statement, wherein she admitted that her earlier statement of September 19, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
October 3, 2003 statement, wherein she admitted that her earlier statement of September 19, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31