Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11761 - 11770 of 38668 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 11761 - 11770 of 38668 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Eduardo Ivanez - 2013AP001901
in denying his motion to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officers after his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136377 - 2015-02-25
in denying his motion to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officers after his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136377 - 2015-02-25
State v. Kristen K. Cleaver - 2004AP000169
custodial statements. The circuit court suppressed the first statements because Cleaver was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20061 - 2005-10-25
custodial statements. The circuit court suppressed the first statements because Cleaver was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20061 - 2005-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Kristen K. Cleaver - 2004AP000169
a circuit court order suppressing Kristen Cleaver’s custodial statements. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20061 - 2017-09-21
a circuit court order suppressing Kristen Cleaver’s custodial statements. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20061 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric C. Martin - 1996AP002299
, the inference to be drawn from the district attorney’s statement is that Martin was a freeloader. We are unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11249 - 2005-03-31
, the inference to be drawn from the district attorney’s statement is that Martin was a freeloader. We are unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11249 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric C. Martin - 1996AP002299
to be drawn from the district attorney’s statement is that Martin was a freeloader. We are unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11249 - 2017-09-19
to be drawn from the district attorney’s statement is that Martin was a freeloader. We are unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Zebelum Smith - 2001AP001662
by excluding extrinsic evidence of the victim’s alleged prior inconsistent statements. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4095 - 2017-09-20
by excluding extrinsic evidence of the victim’s alleged prior inconsistent statements. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4095 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
: “Rule” means a regulation, standard, statement of policy or general order of general application which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808038 - 2024-06-26
: “Rule” means a regulation, standard, statement of policy or general order of general application which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808038 - 2024-06-26
[PDF]
Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc. - 2000AP003039
that the failure to respond was due to a “mix-up.” Mucek’s counsel responded: “There is no statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3242 - 2017-09-19
that the failure to respond was due to a “mix-up.” Mucek’s counsel responded: “There is no statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3242 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven A. Avery - 2010AP000411
of the officers’ conduct of the search. ¶15 The Reasonableness Clause of the Fourth Amendment is a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70129 - 2013-04-23
of the officers’ conduct of the search. ¶15 The Reasonableness Clause of the Fourth Amendment is a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70129 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Avery - 2010AP000411
of the Fourth Amendment is a statement of broad protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70129 - 2014-09-15
of the Fourth Amendment is a statement of broad protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70129 - 2014-09-15