Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11741 - 11750 of 38668 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] Court of Appeals procedures for expedited appeals
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28

State v. Shelleen B. Joyner - 2001AP003049
confession by her sister was not admissible as a statement against the sister’s penal interest; and (3) she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4592 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alexander Marinez - 2009AP000083
closing argument an edited portion of the child’s video statement, which had been admitted at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47324 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] State v. Alexander Marinez - 2009AP000083
video statement, which had been admitted at trial pursuant to § 908.08. We conclude that § 908.08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47324 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Risch - 2019AP002027
—specifically, compelled statements that Risch made to his probation agent and a treatment provider, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22

[PDF]
: “Rule” means a regulation, standard, statement of policy or general order of general application which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808038 - 2024-06-26

[PDF] Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc. - 2000AP003039
that the failure to respond was due to a “mix-up.” Mucek’s counsel responded: “There is no statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3242 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven A. Avery - 2010AP000411
of the officers’ conduct of the search. ¶15 The Reasonableness Clause of the Fourth Amendment is a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70129 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] State v. Steven A. Avery - 2010AP000411
of the Fourth Amendment is a statement of broad protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70129 - 2014-09-15

Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc. - 2000AP003039
to respond was due to a “mix-up.” Mucek’s counsel responded: “There is no statement by anyone from NCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3242 - 2005-03-31