Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 38304 for indications.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 38304 for indications.
State v. Dwan L. Schuck - 1998AP001040
an officer fills out the notice of intent to revoke—which she says is the only mechanism to indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13876 - 2005-03-31
an officer fills out the notice of intent to revoke—which she says is the only mechanism to indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Raul R. Rodriguez - 2005AP002423
inferable from the record and the sentencing court’s rationale indicates that it is founded upon legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26605 - 2017-09-21
inferable from the record and the sentencing court’s rationale indicates that it is founded upon legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel - 1997AP001742
to testify, which Gabriel rejected and even indicated that if called to the stand, he would refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21
to testify, which Gabriel rejected and even indicated that if called to the stand, he would refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Alfred Knowler, Sr. - 2015AP000416
hearing indicates that the circuit court ordered $8,650 of restitution, broken down into $1,000
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157983 - 2017-09-21
hearing indicates that the circuit court ordered $8,650 of restitution, broken down into $1,000
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157983 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chad A. Stites - 2012AP002656
is that it indicates that Stites is entitled to “jail credit” for certain periods of custody on all of Stites’s cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110746 - 2014-04-20
is that it indicates that Stites is entitled to “jail credit” for certain periods of custody on all of Stites’s cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110746 - 2014-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Stites - 2012AP002656
is that it indicates that Stites is entitled to “jail credit” for certain periods of custody on all of Stites’s cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110746 - 2017-09-21
is that it indicates that Stites is entitled to “jail credit” for certain periods of custody on all of Stites’s cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Petitioner v. Nicholas D. Krcma - 2021AP002226
plea hearing indicating Krcma, as part of a plea agreement, pled no contest to one count of third
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611356 - 2023-01-18
plea hearing indicating Krcma, as part of a plea agreement, pled no contest to one count of third
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611356 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. Goodson - 2012AP000498
and the need to protect the public, the court indicated that it was required to “look at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
and the need to protect the public, the court indicated that it was required to “look at the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
State v. Brian K. Goodson - 2012AP000498
character and the need to protect the public, the court indicated that it was required to “look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
character and the need to protect the public, the court indicated that it was required to “look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
Rule Order
could advise the public of a pending investigation in certain cases. He indicated that the rule would
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115410 - 2017-09-21
could advise the public of a pending investigation in certain cases. He indicated that the rule would
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115410 - 2017-09-21