Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11681 - 11690 of 38668 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Patricia A. Weed - 2001AP001476
erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting a hearsay statement made by Weed's deceased husband; (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16514 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark D. Jensen - 2004AP002481
to the police and her voicemail message and other oral statements to Officer Ron Kosman (Kosman). The defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28227 - 2007-02-22

[PDF] Kendric J. Winters v. Rick Raemisch - 2011AP000200
, unsigned statements; (4) erred by relying on unreliable confidential informant statements; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79524 - 2014-09-15

Kendric J. Winters v. Rick Raemisch - 2011AP000200
process and their own rules by relying on anonymous, unsigned statements; (4) erred by relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79524 - 2012-03-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the circuit court erred by concluding the disputed statements were either substantially true or a non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724162 - 2023-11-08

[PDF] Michael M. Bell v. Albert Gonzales - 2022AP001924
the circuit court erred by concluding the disputed statements were either substantially true or a non
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724162 - 2023-11-08

[PDF] State v. Allan J. Salinas - 2004AP001783
the admission of a prior statement the victim made to a police officer. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17940 - 2017-09-21

State v. Allan J. Salinas - 2004AP001783
of substantial battery as a repeat offender.[1] He challenges the admission of a prior statement the victim made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17940 - 2005-04-27

[PDF] State v. Marquis D. Hudson - 2004AP001956
have suppressed incriminating statements he made while an officer conversed with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20510 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marquis D. Hudson - 2004AP001956
. Hudson argues that the trial court should have suppressed incriminating statements he made while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20510 - 2005-12-05