Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11651 - 11660 of 18901 for transfer by affidavit.

State v. Kenneth G. Hopkins - 1997AP000130
on an affidavit executed by himself and filed as part of this appeal. No motion challenging defense trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11962 - 2005-03-31

Roderick Flowers v. City of Madison, Wisconsin - 2012AP000279
and the answer joins an issue of fact or law. Id. If issue has been joined, we examine the parties’ affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06

[PDF] State v. Kenneth G. Hopkins - 1997AP000130
’ vehicle as unreasonable. As proof of these claims, Hopkins relies solely on an affidavit executed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11962 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. William Goodman - 2002AP003088
his defense of necessity. ¶5 Except for the absence of affidavits and other evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5898 - 2017-09-19

Rachel Jensen v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company - 1995AP002953
816, 820 (1987). We first examine the pleadings and affidavits to determine whether a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9878 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nickolas James Laumann - 2012AP000927
the child victim to recant. In fact, Laumann admitted in an affidavit seeking to restore his privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103230 - 2013-10-21

Watertronics LLC v. Control Techniques Americas LLC - 2013AP000521
contract remedies for the allegedly nonconforming VFDs. In response, Watertronics submitted an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108062 - 2014-02-18

[PDF] Watertronics LLC v. Control Techniques Americas LLC - 2013AP000521
nonconforming VFDs. In response, Watertronics submitted an affidavit of Reinders, who asserted that where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108062 - 2017-09-21

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Nicole C. M. - 2006AP000721
of the CHIPS order stated that TPR warnings were attached; and second, an affidavit of services swore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25509 - 2006-06-12

Independent Inspections, Ltd. v. David Sturdevant - 1999AP001988
indicated in its affidavits that it intended to always employ an in-house inspector
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15803 - 2005-03-31