Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11651 - 11660 of 66972 for had.
Search results 11651 - 11660 of 66972 for had.
State v. Nathaniel Wondergem - 1998AP000721
if he had any marijuana and that Wondergem responded, “What would happen if I said yes?” Officer Peters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13739 - 2005-03-31
if he had any marijuana and that Wondergem responded, “What would happen if I said yes?” Officer Peters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alfonso Dennis - 1997AP002166
of three other prostitutes, Valerie Pagan, Debra Dunaway and Candi Rex. Each testified that Dennis had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12795 - 2005-03-31
of three other prostitutes, Valerie Pagan, Debra Dunaway and Candi Rex. Each testified that Dennis had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12795 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin - 1998AP002420
only[2]—even though they were obtained by the officers through further questioning after Franklin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
only[2]—even though they were obtained by the officers through further questioning after Franklin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick D. Jones - 2004AP002111
of plea withdrawal, Jones argued that his plea had not been knowing, intelligent and voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27379 - 2014-09-15
of plea withdrawal, Jones argued that his plea had not been knowing, intelligent and voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27379 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick D. Jones - 2004AP002111
also requested a new sentencing hearing. In support of plea withdrawal, Jones argued that his plea had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27379 - 2006-12-11
also requested a new sentencing hearing. In support of plea withdrawal, Jones argued that his plea had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27379 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Fuerst - 2007AP000337
that “[i]f I had known that my sentence was not ‘capped’ by the plea agreement or my information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31019 - 2014-09-15
that “[i]f I had known that my sentence was not ‘capped’ by the plea agreement or my information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31019 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael L. Fuerst - 2007AP000337
recommendation from a plea agreement.” Fuerst claimed in the affidavit that “[i]f I had known that my sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31019 - 2007-11-26
recommendation from a plea agreement.” Fuerst claimed in the affidavit that “[i]f I had known that my sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31019 - 2007-11-26
State v. Kristina L. Vogt - 2003AP001853
performance actually had an adverse effect on the defense.” State v. Reed, 2002 WI App 209, ¶17, 256 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31
performance actually had an adverse effect on the defense.” State v. Reed, 2002 WI App 209, ¶17, 256 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglass Potter - 2003AP001834
that Potter was “drunk” and Prochaska “had been drinking.” While Rosenow was waiting for the men
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20
that Potter was “drunk” and Prochaska “had been drinking.” While Rosenow was waiting for the men
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Brittany S. Baier - 2019AP000389
had a prejudicial effect on a hypothetical average jury. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260758 - 2020-05-19
had a prejudicial effect on a hypothetical average jury. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260758 - 2020-05-19