Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11151 - 11160 of 66972 for had.
Search results 11151 - 11160 of 66972 for had.
[PDF]
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F. - 2004AP000164
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7245 - 2017-09-20
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7245 - 2017-09-20
State v. Joseph Koch - 1999AP002059
at the preliminary hearing was not sufficient to establish that the crime of theft by fraud had probably been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15837 - 2005-03-31
at the preliminary hearing was not sufficient to establish that the crime of theft by fraud had probably been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15837 - 2005-03-31
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F. - 2004AP000163
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS), see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS), see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F. - 2004AP000164
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS), see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7245 - 2005-03-31
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS), see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F. - 2004AP000163
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7244 - 2017-09-20
. Jones testified that Hertel had been designated a child in need of protection and services (CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7244 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Cathy Wallace v. Adult Family Care Homes - 1997AP002793
was responsible for the residents. Wallace was always the only staff present. Wallace’s mother had a friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13062 - 2017-09-21
was responsible for the residents. Wallace was always the only staff present. Wallace’s mother had a friend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13062 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Linda S. Merkel v. Labor and Industry Review Commission - 2002AP003157
, 2001. ¶4 At the hearing, Merryfield testified that Merkel had been warned three times before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5927 - 2017-09-19
, 2001. ¶4 At the hearing, Merryfield testified that Merkel had been warned three times before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5927 - 2017-09-19
State v. James A. Genett - 1997AP001718
grandmother, she believed October 23, 1991, was a possible date for the assault because Patricia had the girls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
grandmother, she believed October 23, 1991, was a possible date for the assault because Patricia had the girls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12618 - 2005-03-31
Cathy Wallace v. Adult Family Care Homes - 1997AP002793
. Wallace’s mother had a friend named Carl Steppert, Jr., a man Wallace had been acquainted with her entire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13062 - 2005-03-31
. Wallace’s mother had a friend named Carl Steppert, Jr., a man Wallace had been acquainted with her entire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13062 - 2005-03-31
State v. George H. Sergent - 2010AP003136
a reasonable doubt that he had attempted an act of genital or anal intrusion based on the victim’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81178 - 2012-04-18
a reasonable doubt that he had attempted an act of genital or anal intrusion based on the victim’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81178 - 2012-04-18