Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 20758 for warrants.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 20758 for warrants.
State v. David R. Knapp - 2009AP001463
prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We therefore affirm. ¶2 The following undisputed facts are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
prejudicial to warrant a new trial. We therefore affirm. ¶2 The following undisputed facts are taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel M. Andreola, Sr. - 2004AP000580
the scope of the search warrants. This argument fails because Andreola appears to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24571 - 2017-09-21
the scope of the search warrants. This argument fails because Andreola appears to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24571 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Z. Williams - 1999AP002575
on October 1, and his probation agent issued a probation apprehension warrant. Williams was apprehended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16052 - 2005-03-31
on October 1, and his probation agent issued a probation apprehension warrant. Williams was apprehended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William L. Tinder - 2001AP000689
of the “exigent circumstances” exception to the warrant requirement. This is because once the blood was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3713 - 2017-09-19
of the “exigent circumstances” exception to the warrant requirement. This is because once the blood was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3713 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank C. Schiller - 2021AP000942
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because the law does not warrant suppression based on Thompson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564853 - 2022-09-14
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Because the law does not warrant suppression based on Thompson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564853 - 2022-09-14
[PDF]
State v. Lanc B. Sheldon - 2015AP001866
warrant was issued in the present case but law enforcement was unable to execute the warrant because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179290 - 2017-09-21
warrant was issued in the present case but law enforcement was unable to execute the warrant because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179290 - 2017-09-21
State v. William L. Tinder - 2001AP000689
to the warrant requirement. This is because once the blood was removed from his body, there was no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3713 - 2005-03-31
to the warrant requirement. This is because once the blood was removed from his body, there was no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mastella L. Jackson - 2014AP002238
, where officers were already conducting a search pursuant to a search warrant. There, she revealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171110 - 2017-09-21
, where officers were already conducting a search pursuant to a search warrant. There, she revealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171110 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was revoked in three criminal cases. DOC filed the revocation order and warrant in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
was revoked in three criminal cases. DOC filed the revocation order and warrant in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Lloyd R. Riddle - 2006AP002085
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15