Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 38338 for indications.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 38338 for indications.
[PDF]
State v. Nehemias Huertas, Jr. - 2021AP000302
809.32(3). In this case, the record indicates that a claim that Huertas is entitled to additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585185 - 2022-10-28
809.32(3). In this case, the record indicates that a claim that Huertas is entitled to additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585185 - 2022-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Shawn T. Holliman - 2016AP001811
to challenge the imposition of the DNA surcharge as reflected on the judgment of conviction. We indicated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199231 - 2017-10-24
to challenge the imposition of the DNA surcharge as reflected on the judgment of conviction. We indicated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199231 - 2017-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Christopher E. Watkins - 2017AP001537
of the offense. Although the plea questionnaire has a check mark by the box indicating that the elements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211346 - 2018-04-16
of the offense. Although the plea questionnaire has a check mark by the box indicating that the elements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211346 - 2018-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Marvin Frank Robinson - 2019AP002278
Robinson on one of the charges for which he was convicted. The court indicated that in the alternative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627037 - 2023-02-23
Robinson on one of the charges for which he was convicted. The court indicated that in the alternative
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627037 - 2023-02-23
[PDF]
William J. Evers v. Dennis C. Luebke - 1996AP003354
to Evers’ petition indicated that Evers’ petition was “verified and sworn to before me,” the notary’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11737 - 2017-09-20
to Evers’ petition indicated that Evers’ petition was “verified and sworn to before me,” the notary’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11737 - 2017-09-20
William J. Evers v. Dennis C. Luebke - 1996AP003354
(Ct. App. 1984). Although the notary to Evers’ petition indicated that Evers’ petition was “verified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11737 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1984). Although the notary to Evers’ petition indicated that Evers’ petition was “verified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11737 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene Stone - 2000AP000854
possessed drugs with the intent to deliver but that the items seized from the apartment indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2434 - 2005-03-31
possessed drugs with the intent to deliver but that the items seized from the apartment indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2434 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter J. Druley - 2000AP001185
stated that his false testimony and continued failure to admit guilt at sentencing indicated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2561 - 2005-03-31
stated that his false testimony and continued failure to admit guilt at sentencing indicated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2561 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Montrel Che Evans - 2012AP001195
Kachelski’s supplemental no-merit report indicates that she has identified an issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99604 - 2014-09-15
Kachelski’s supplemental no-merit report indicates that she has identified an issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ellen Katherin Wunnicke - 2011AP002738
was subject to a .02 limit. Those were sufficient indicators of alcohol use to be probable cause at the .02
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91217 - 2014-09-15
was subject to a .02 limit. Those were sufficient indicators of alcohol use to be probable cause at the .02
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91217 - 2014-09-15