Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 46600 for adult name change.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 46600 for adult name change.
[PDF]
Donald H. Tesker v. Town of Saukville
from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Ozaukee (If "Special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10799 - 2017-09-20
from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Ozaukee (If "Special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10799 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that Sara lacked the authority to change the children’s school district without Lonnie’s consent because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108476 - 2014-02-26
that Sara lacked the authority to change the children’s school district without Lonnie’s consent because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108476 - 2014-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or resentencing, alleging that a new factor, namely, a change in parole board policy, warranted an earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145725 - 2017-09-21
or resentencing, alleging that a new factor, namely, a change in parole board policy, warranted an earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion. The court found that Sara lacked the authority to change the children’s school district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108476 - 2017-09-21
the motion. The court found that Sara lacked the authority to change the children’s school district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108476 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sought sentence modification or resentencing, alleging that a new factor, namely, a change in parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145725 - 2015-08-10
sought sentence modification or resentencing, alleging that a new factor, namely, a change in parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145725 - 2015-08-10
[PDF]
State v. William R. Scott
without a hearing, concluding that legislative changes in sentence ranges are not new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19
without a hearing, concluding that legislative changes in sentence ranges are not new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19
State v. William R. Scott
a hearing, concluding that legislative changes in sentence ranges are not new factors. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
a hearing, concluding that legislative changes in sentence ranges are not new factors. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
Dairyland Fuels, Inc. v. State
names the DOT as the respondent, the Commission’s findings and award refer only to the DOT and note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15530 - 2005-03-31
names the DOT as the respondent, the Commission’s findings and award refer only to the DOT and note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15530 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
., for terminating Rosemary’s parental rights: Question 1: Has [child’s name] been adjudged to be in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16002 - 2005-03-31
., for terminating Rosemary’s parental rights: Question 1: Has [child’s name] been adjudged to be in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16002 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
., for terminating Rosemary’s parental rights: Question 1: Has [child’s name] been adjudged to be in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16004 - 2005-03-31
., for terminating Rosemary’s parental rights: Question 1: Has [child’s name] been adjudged to be in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16004 - 2005-03-31