Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10691 - 10700 of 66972 for had.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Suzanne M. Smith - 2011AP002946
that the OLR had proven misconduct in 11 of the remaining 13 non-stipulated counts. The OLR does not appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105517 - 2017-09-21

State v. Brent T. Novy - 2011AP000407
the State to use certain fingerprint evidence and related testimony in rebuttal, which the court had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94150 - 2013-05-05

[PDF] State v. Brent T. Novy - 2011AP000408
to use certain fingerprint evidence and related testimony in rebuttal, which the court had previously
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94150 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” as of the hearing date (February 7, 2022). ¶5 The next month, Adam told Elizabeth that he had received the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806882 - 2024-05-29

State v. Tremell Jackson - 2003AP002064
, and defense counsel attempted to contact the assistant district attorney, who had already left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rock K. Ingram - 1995AP002964
used to show that Ingram had the motive and intent to elude the police. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9882 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Perry M. Ankerson v. EPIK Corporation - 2004AP000129
misrepresentation. EPIK had not requested that it be included in the derivative claims as a party plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7231 - 2017-09-20

State v. William F. Williams - 1999AP000812
don’t care. I’ve had too many bad experiences with Alford pleas. In fact, I’ve never had a decent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15307 - 2005-03-31

Perry M. Ankerson v. EPIK Corporation - 2004AP000129
, promissory estoppel, and fraudulent misrepresentation. EPIK had not requested that it be included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7231 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sonniel R. Gidarisingh - 1998AP001744
reason for denying his motion for a Machner hearing,1 i.e., he had made no showing of medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14165 - 2014-09-15