Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10471 - 10480 of 19091 for citi.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that, in September 2011, Thompson violated a City of Madison ordinance setting forth certain steps a landlord must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201442 - 2017-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. Third, it was a breach of prosecutorial discretion to not refer the battery case to the city
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32345 - 2008-04-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
v. City of Chicago, 940 F.2d 233, 238 (7th Cir. 1991) (citing Archie v. City of Racine, 847 F.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922792 - 2025-03-04

Lina M. Mueller v. McMillian Warner Insurance Company
” in a Milwaukee curfew ordinance. See City of Milwaukee v. K.F., 145 Wis. 2d 24, 37-38, 426 N.W.2d 329 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19184 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] WI App 43
approach. In Heef Realty & Investments, LLP v. City of Cedarburg Board of Appeals, 2015 WI App 23, 361
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
traditionally employed to restrain an inferior tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction.” City of Madison v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79522 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 27
, and the issue of privity presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Pasko v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240721 - 2019-07-08

[PDF] WI 25
was not permitted because the jury was capable of drawing its own conclusions on the issue of negligence); City
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48698 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
also Coffey v. City of Milwaukee, 74 Wis. 2d 526, 541, 247 N.W.2d 132 (1976). ¶32 Here, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595501 - 2022-11-29

Appleton Papers, Inc. v. The Home Indemnity Company
already litigated in the state action. See id. at 409. The City of Dallas moved to dismiss the federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15644 - 2005-03-31