Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1031 - 1040 of 68466 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, which was granted by the circuit court. It appears Wisconsin Bell did not directly rebut SSHD’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93349 - 2013-02-25

COURT OF APPEALS
conviction because he did not validly waive his right to counsel when he entered a pro se plea to that charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68978 - 2011-08-01

COURT OF APPEALS
ordering him to avoid contact with his son, Gaige S.[1] He argues the evidence at the hearing did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32371 - 2008-04-07

State v. Sebastian Molina
Molina and was not offered as character evidence. Molina’s trial counsel explained that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael H. Coppens
the trial even though it did not provide a courtesy copy to the court and did not request a hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2957 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Joshua C.S.
property did not testify at the hearing. The trial court did not err by relying on circumstantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14362 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
would take immediate corrective action. Ron M. did not offer any proof that Lucille had been abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27418 - 2006-12-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
did not rely upon inaccurate information at sentencing, and Stevens did not show the existence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240641 - 2019-05-15

[PDF] State v. Michael H. Coppens
the trial even though it did not provide a courtesy copy to the court and did not request a hearing date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2956 - 2017-09-19

State v. Thomas Alan Dhein
to withdraw his no contest pleas. Because we conclude that the trial court did not misuse its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12861 - 2005-03-31