Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10291 - 10300 of 68957 for had.
Search results 10291 - 10300 of 68957 for had.
[PDF]
Deborah J. Bull v. City of St. Croix Falls
. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from further damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
. This court disagrees. The City acknowledged it had a duty to protect Bull’s property from further damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15664 - 2017-09-21
Richard J. Allen, Jr. v. Kari A. Allen
the authority to expunge any arrears that had accrued up to January 1, 2003. We therefore reverse that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7034 - 2005-03-31
the authority to expunge any arrears that had accrued up to January 1, 2003. We therefore reverse that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7034 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
, we determine whether the magistrate had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
enhancements declared void. Malkmus argued that the State had not proven the existence of a prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
Mathew E. Levin v. Shawn M. Radtke
that Radtke had been “stalking and harassing” him, and it described certain specific instances. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
that Radtke had been “stalking and harassing” him, and it described certain specific instances. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2430 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
National Exchange Bank & Trust v. Southside Tire Co., Inc.
had a security interest in the truck. In November 2000, the truck was towed to Southside’s store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5118 - 2017-09-19
had a security interest in the truck. In November 2000, the truck was towed to Southside’s store
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5118 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey M. Wesoloski
escape but that the State had not offered a plea bargain. The court advised Wesoloski of the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8198 - 2017-09-19
escape but that the State had not offered a plea bargain. The court advised Wesoloski of the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8198 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline
her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her to believe she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her to believe she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31