Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 14293 for probate.
Search results 1021 - 1030 of 14293 for probate.
Earl L. Diehl v. David H. Schwarz - 2006AP001664
of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. ¶2 Diehl first raises several challenges to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. ¶2 Diehl first raises several challenges to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
[PDF]
Earl L. Diehl v. David H. Schwarz - 2006AP001664
petition for certiorari review of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. No. 2006AP1664
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15
petition for certiorari review of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. No. 2006AP1664
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Johnston - 2014AP000093
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darrick P. Jordan - 2016AP001589
there is no basis for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Jordan’s probation. Jordan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189234 - 2017-09-21
there is no basis for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Jordan’s probation. Jordan
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Taz Milton VerHagen - 2010AP002720
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brandon C. Jones - 2021AP000283
and two years’ extended supervision. The court placed Jones on probation for three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
and two years’ extended supervision. The court placed Jones on probation for three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Darrel L. Abramczak - 2015AP000880
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gregory M. Holloway - 2009AP003022
by his probation agent. We affirm. ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Holloway has multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29
by his probation agent. We affirm. ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Holloway has multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29
Jason Amundson v. Village of Fairchild - 2001AP000166
employment provided “[H]is starting date will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3517 - 2005-03-31
employment provided “[H]is starting date will be April 1, 1999 with a 90 day probation period and he obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3517 - 2005-03-31
State v. Taz Milton VerHagen - 2010AP002719
that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues that the only reason he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues that the only reason he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18