Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 15397 for probate.
Search results 1011 - 1020 of 15397 for probate.
Steven E. Kraus v. City of Waukesha Police and Fire Commission
rank for failing to successfully complete probation for nondisciplinary reasons, is entitled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16498 - 2015-02-02
rank for failing to successfully complete probation for nondisciplinary reasons, is entitled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16498 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and stayed a sentence of twenty years and it placed Husnik on probation for eight years.2 ¶3 Husnik
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636106 - 2023-03-23
and stayed a sentence of twenty years and it placed Husnik on probation for eight years.2 ¶3 Husnik
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636106 - 2023-03-23
WI App 34 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1163-CR Complete T...
, the State agreed to recommend probation with 90 days conditional jail time, various treatment-based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107668 - 2014-03-25
, the State agreed to recommend probation with 90 days conditional jail time, various treatment-based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107668 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
WI App 34
, the State agreed to recommend probation with 90 days conditional jail time, various treatment-based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107668 - 2017-09-21
, the State agreed to recommend probation with 90 days conditional jail time, various treatment-based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
), concluding there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Johnston’s probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
, VerHagen argues that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
a judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation. Assistant State Public Defender Katie R. York
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues that the only reason he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
that the court mischaracterized his probation as being “mostly negative.” He argues that the only reason he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. ¶2 Diehl first raises several challenges to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
of a decision revoking his probation. We affirm. ¶2 Diehl first raises several challenges to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30999 - 2007-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
by his probation agent. We affirm. ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Holloway has multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29
by his probation agent. We affirm. ¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. Holloway has multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56446 - 2010-11-29