Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 66961 for had.
Search results 10061 - 10070 of 66961 for had.
State v. Mark M. Loutsch - 2003AP001757
had a child support obligation and would accrue arrearages, by his estimate, of around $15,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
had a child support obligation and would accrue arrearages, by his estimate, of around $15,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6639 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald P. Lane - 2007AP001755
restaurant, which had no building lights or outside sign lights on, at approximately 2:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33775 - 2008-08-20
restaurant, which had no building lights or outside sign lights on, at approximately 2:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33775 - 2008-08-20
[PDF]
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac - 2001AP001042
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior foreclosure action between the parties. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3855 - 2017-09-20
Lewis Lloyd v. Firstar Bank Fond du Lac - 2001AP001042
of res judicata. Firstar asserted that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3855 - 2005-03-31
of res judicata. Firstar asserted that Lloyd’s claims had already been adjudicated in a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3855 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph Axelson - 1994AP003095
held that all of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
held that all of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Axelson - 1994AP003095
of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree, and affirm. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
of Axelson's claims had been unsuccessfully raised in his direct appeal. We agree, and affirm. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank S. Smith - 1995AP001043
. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had no prior intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had no prior intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8921 - 2017-09-19
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline - 1999AP000820
her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her to believe she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her to believe she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15312 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank S. Smith - 1995AP001043
an entrapment defense. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
an entrapment defense. The trial court instructed the jury on that defense as follows: If Mr. Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gail B. Eder v. Daniel P. Merline - 1999AP000820
, the court limited her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15312 - 2017-09-21
, the court limited her testimony to those incidents that had occurred in recent weeks causing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15312 - 2017-09-21