News

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has voted to accept two new cases, and the Court acted to deny review in a number of other cases. The case numbers, counties of origin, and the issues presented in granted cases are listed below. More detailed synopses will be released at a later date. More information about pending appellate cases can be found on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Access website. Published Court of Appeals opinions can be found here, and the status of cases pending in the Supreme Court can be found here.

2017AP2364-CR  State v. David Gutierrez

Supreme Court case type: Petition for Review
Court of Appeals: District II
Circuit Court: Green Lake County, (Judge W. Andrew Voigt, Columbia County Circuit Court, presiding) reversed and cause remanded
Long caption: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner v. David Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant
Issues presented:

• Did the Court of Appeals violate the elementary principle of appellate review of trial court evidentiary rulings when it second-guessed the wisdom of the trial court’s decision: (a) to exclude defense evidence that DNA from five unidentified males was found on the child sexual assault victim’s underwear, and the DNA of three unidentified males was found on the outside of her mouth, 24 hours after the alleged oral assault by Gutierrez; (b) to allow Gutierrez to prove that his DNA was not found on her mouth or on her underwear; and (c) to allow defense counsel to examine the expert witness about how long transferred DNA might remain on the victim’s mouth and underwear, and how easily it can be removed?
• Did the Court of Appeals act contrary to the interests protected by Wis. Stat. § 972.11(2)(b), Wisconsin’s rape shield law, when it rejected out of hand the trial court’s concern that the jury might infer that the victim had sexual contact with one or more of the unidentified males, not including Gutierrez, whose DNA was found on the victim’s underwear and on the outside of her mouth 24 hours after the assault?
• Did the Court of Appeals err when it held that the trial court’s evidentiary ruling led to a misleading inference that the absence of Gutierrez’s DNA around the victim’s mouth and on her underwear could be explained by her having washed it off immediately after he sexually assaulted her, even though the DNA of other males was found 24 hours later?

2018AP283  Moreschi v. Village of Wms. Bay and Town of Linn ETZ Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Supreme Court case type: Petition for Review
Court of Appeals: District II
Circuit Court: Walworth County, Judge David M. Reddy, affirmed
Long caption: Gail Moreschi, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Village of Williams Bay and Town of Linn ETZ Zoning Board of Appeals, William L. Edwards and Suzanne Edwards, Defendants-Respondents
Issues presented:

• The novel question of whether a board can create new minutes and new decisions after receipt of a writ of certiorari action must be addressed by the Supreme Court to preserve the due process protections of writ certiorari actions.
• The Court of Appeals’ majority opinion’s determination of what constitutes a “triggering event” for purposes of appeal on a writ of certiorari conflicts with Wis. Stats. § 62.23(7); ETZ ordinances; or the Court of Appeals’ holding in Zelman.
• Whether the Board’s failure to follow the correct theory of law is a question of law, not fact, that is likely to recur unless resolved by the Supreme Court.

Review denied: The Supreme Court denied review in the following cases. As the state's law-developing court, the Supreme Court exercises its discretion to select for review only those cases that fit certain statutory criteria (see Wis. Stat. § 809.62). Except where indicated, these cases came to the Court via petition for review by the party who lost in the lower court:

Columbia
19AP744-W    Maday v. Carr

Dane
18AP1153-CR   State v. Mouth

Douglas
18AP1866-CR    State v. Kielb-Justice Brian K. Hagedorn concurs.

Fond du Lac
18AP1920-CR    State v. Gray

Grant
18AP1006-CR   State v. Tiggs

Juneau
19AP553-556    Juneau County DHS v. S.G.M.

Kenosha
18AP1310-CR    State v. Sanders

Milwaukee
16AP728    State v. Wright
17AP2254-2255-CR    State v. Xiong
18AP72-CR    State v. Jackson
18AP234-CR    State v. Gabriel
18AP491    State v. Lewis
18AP987   Milwaukee County v. D.C.B.
18AP1144-CR    State v. Hutchins
18AP1256-CR    State v. Hutchinson
18AP1591-CR    State v. Young
18AP1644-CR    State v. Slack
18AP1684-W     Echols v. McDermott
18AP1748-W    Cunningham v. Foster
18AP1969    State v. Maldonado
19AP631    Federal National Mortgage Association v. Bach-Justice Brian K. Hagedorn did not participate.
19AP1478-W    Pryztarski v. Court of Appeals

Racine
18AP647-CR    State v. Lorbecke
18AP899-CR    State v. Taylor-Justice Brian K. Hagedorn did not participate.

Walworth
18AP860-CR   State v. Valdez-Justice Brian K. Hagedorn did not participate.

Waukesha
19AP1316-W    Puchner v. Circuit Court for Waukesha County-Justice Brian K. Hagedorn did not participate.
19AP1431-1432-OA    Weller v. Petitioner

Winnebago
19AP222    Lietz v. Frost-Justice Brian K. Hagedorn did not participate.

Contact:
Tom Sheehan
Court Information Officer
(608) 261-6640