Supreme Court of Wisconsin

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

No.  08-11

 

 

In the matter of the amendment of Supreme Court Rule 40.08 relating to adverse determination of a bar applicant's character and fitness.

 

FILED

 

NOV 1, 2010

 

A. John Voelker

Acting Clerk of Supreme Court

Madison, WI

 

 

 

 


On April 1, 2008, the Board of Bar Examiners (BBE) by its former director, John E. Kosobucki, petitioned this court for an order amending Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 40.08 relating to adverse determination of a bar applicant's character and fitness.  An amended petition was filed on July 24, 2008.  A public hearing on the petition was held on Friday, February 26, 2010.  A second amended petition was filed on October 22, 2010, by BBE Director Jacquelynn Rothstein.

IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing on the petition shall be held in the Supreme Court Room in the State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin, on Wednesday, January 12, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court's conference in the matter shall be held promptly following the public hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition and memorandum in support of the petition shall be made available on the Web site of the Wisconsin Supreme Court under Rules.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notice of the hearing be given by a single publication of a copy of this order and of the petition in the official state newspaper and in an official publication of the State Bar of Wisconsin not more than 60 days nor less than 30 days before the date of the hearing.[1]

Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, this 1st day of November, 2010. 

 

BY THE COURT:

 

 

 

                   A. John Voelker

Acting Clerk of Supreme Court

 


 



[1] Notice of the hearing will appear in the December 2010 Wisconsin Lawyer, the official publication of the State Bar of Wisconsin, approximately 28 days prior to the hearing rather than the required minimum of 30 days.  Pursuant to its rule-making authority under Wis. Stat. § 751.12 and its Internal Operating Procedures, the court exercises its discretion to allow this unavoidable deviation from the requirements.