|
|
|
Case No.: |
02-1727 |
|
Complete Title: |
|
|
|
Kenosha
Hospital & Medical Center, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jesus
E. Garcia, Defendant, Richter
Industries, Inc., Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant- Petitioner. |
|
|
|
|
|
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 2004 WI 105 Reported at: ___ Wis. 2d ___, 683 N.W.2d 425 |
|
|
|
|
Opinion Filed: |
November 4, 2004 |
|
Submitted on Briefs: |
||
Oral Argument: |
||
|
|
|
Source of Appeal: |
|
|
|
Court: |
|
|
County: |
|
|
Judge: |
|
|
|
|
Justices: |
|
|
|
Concurred: |
|
|
Dissented: |
|
|
Not Participating: |
BUTLER, J., did not participate. |
|
|
|
Attorneys: |
|
2004 WI 137
notice
This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.
¶1 PER CURIAM. (on motion for clarification). Richter Industries, Inc. petitions this court for clarification of our decision in Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Garcia, 2004 WI 105, ____ Wis. 2d ____, 683 N.W.2d 425, regarding directions upon remand. Specifically, Richter asks this court to clarify the directions upon remand as to whether Kenosha Hospital should be allowed to conduct further discovery to support its claim that the notice of motion for judgment against Richter was properly served. The court answers the question in the affirmative.
¶2 The motion for clarification is granted, without costs.
¶3 LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate.