COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED MAY 7, 1996 |
NOTICE |
A party may file with the
Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of
Appeals. See § 808.10 and
Rule 809.62, Stats. |
This opinion is subject to
further editing. If published, the
official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. |
Nos. 95-2285
95-2286
95-2802
STATE
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF
APPEALS
DISTRICT III
No. 95-2285
LIBBIE PESEK,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LINCOLN COUNTY,
LINCOLN COUNTY GENERAL
RELIEF AGENCY
and LINCOLN COUNTY
DEPT. OF SOCIAL
SERVICES,
Respondents-Respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 95-2286
LIBBIE PESEK,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LINCOLN COUNTY,
and LINCOLN COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES, GENERAL
RELIEF AGENCY,
Respondents-Respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 95-2802
LIBBIE PESEK,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD
OF
SUPERVISORS, LINCOLN
COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES, and LINCOLN
COUNTY
GENERAL RELIEF,
Respondents-Respondents.
APPEALS from judgments
of the circuit court for Lincoln County:
ROBERT N. LEDIN, Judge. Affirmed.
Before Cane, P.J.,
LaRocque and Myse, JJ.
PER
CURIAM. Libbie Pesek appeals judgments denying her mandamus
and declaratory relief and upholding Lincoln County's decision denying her
medical and nonmedical general relief.
The County denied her general relief after she refused to sign two
consent forms, the first authorizing the County to be reimbursed for the cost
of general relief benefits if she received retroactive federal disability
benefits and the second releasing her medical records for review by welfare
officials. Because we conclude that the
County properly denied general relief benefits based on Pesek's refusal to sign
the reimbursement form, we decline to review any of the issues relating to the
medical authorization form and affirm the judgments.
Pesek applied for both
Federal SSI disability and County general relief benefits. Pesek refused to sign a form that gives the
County permission to be reimbursed from any retroactive SSI benefits she
received. General relief applicants are
not eligible for benefits if they receive SSI benefits. See § 49.015(2)(a), Stats.
The legislature has explicitly given the County authority to require
general relief recipients to sign a reimbursement form. See § 49.02(2r), Stats.
This explicit authority carries with it implicit authority to deny
general relief benefits for a recipient who refuses to sign the form. Without this power, the County would be
unable to carry out the statute's purpose of preventing general relief
recipients from keeping both general relief and SSI benefits.
Pesek raises numerous
issues regarding the requirement that she consent to release of her medical
records and the manner in which that rule was promulgated. Because Pesek refuses to sign the
reimbursement form, she is not entitled to medical benefits regardless of the
propriety of the medical records consent policy. Therefore, a decision on the medical records argument would not
have a practical effect on the question of whether Pesek is entitled to general
relief medical benefits and this court will not decide that moot issue. See State ex rel. Wisconsin
Envtl. Decade v. Joint Comm. for Review of Admin. Rules, 73 Wis.2d 234,
236, 243 N.W.2d 497, 498 (1976).
Finally Pesek argues
that the County may not be represented in these cases by the attorney for its
liability insurer. Pesek contends that
her due process rights were violated because the County did not appear by its
corporation counsel. She has failed,
however, to establish how the County's choice of attorney impacts any of her
substantial rights.
By the Court.—Judgments
affirmed.
This opinion will not be
published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.