COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED March 5, 1996 |
NOTICE |
A party may file with the
Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of
Appeals. See § 808.10 and
Rule 809.62, Stats. |
This opinion is subject to
further editing. If published, the
official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. |
No. 95-1228
STATE
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF
APPEALS
DISTRICT I
DEBORAH L. GUENTHER
and GLENN GUENTHER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ST. PAUL FIRE AND
MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Respondent.
APPEAL from an order of
the circuit court for Milwaukee County:
LOUISE M. TESMER, Judge. Affirmed.
Before Wedemeyer, P.J.,
Fine and Schudson, JJ.
PER
CURIAM. Deborah L. and Glenn Guenther appeal from an order of
the circuit court dismissing their cause of action against St. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company for failure to effectuate proper service. On appeal, the Guenthers argue that they
sufficiently complied with § 801.02, Stats.,
by placing a copy of the summons and complaint in the United States Express
Mail, addressed to the Commissioner of Insurance, on the sixtieth day after
filing the summons and complaint. The
only issue is whether, on the record before us, the Guenthers' attempted
service was timely under § 801.02, Stats. That is a question of law that we review de
novo. Dungan v. County of
Pierce, 170 Wis.2d 89, 93–94, 486 N.W.2d 579, 581 (Ct. App. 1992).
Section 801.02(1), Stats., provides:
A
civil action in which a personal judgment is sought is commenced as to any
defendant when a summons and a complaint naming the person as defendant are
filed with the court, provided service of an authenticated copy of the summons
and of the complaint is made upon the defendant under this chapter within 60
days after filing.
It is undisputed that
the summons and complaint in this action were filed on December 6, 1994. It is also undisputed that the Guenthers
mailed the summons and complaint to the Commissioner of Insurance on the
sixtieth day, February 6, 1995. It is
further undisputed that the summons and complaint were received by the
Commissioner of Insurance on the sixty-first day, February 7, 1995.
In attempting to
effectuate service on the Commissioner of Insurance, the Guenthers utilized
§ 601.73(1)(a), Stats.,
which provides:
Requirements for
effective service. Service upon
the commissioner or secretary of state under s. 601.72 is service on the
principal, if:
(a) Two
copies of the process are left in the hands or office of the commissioner or
secretary of state respectively.
In construing
the rules of civil procedure, we apply ordinary principles of statutory
construction. See Davies
v. Heiman, 186 Wis.2d 370, 376, 520 N.W.2d 917, 919 (Ct. App.
1994). If the meaning of a statute is
clear on its face, we will not look outside the statute in applying it. Wisconsin Elec. Power Co. v. Public
Service Comm'n, 110 Wis.2d 530, 534, 329 N.W.2d 178, 181 (1983). The Guenthers assert that “left in the
hands” includes placing in the mail.
The trial court disagreed, interpreting § 601.73(1)(a), Stats., as requiring actual
receipt. From the text of the statute
itself, it is clear that the Guenthers proposed construction is
implausible. The language of §
601.73(1)(a), Stats.,
specifically “left in the hands ... of the commissioner” indicates that service
through the Commissioner of Insurance is made at the time the summons and
complaint are physically in the office of the Commissioner of Insurance. Therefore, the Guenthers failed to satisfy
the requirements of § 801.02(1), Stats.,
by mailing the summons and complaint on the sixtieth day because the documents
were not physically received by the Commissioner of Insurance until the
sixty-first day.
By the Court.—Order
affirmed.
This opinion will not be
published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.