COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED December 19, 1996 |
NOTICE |
A party may file with the
Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of
Appeals. See § 808.10 and
Rule 809.62, Stats. |
This opinion is subject to
further editing. If published, the
official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. |
No. 95-1143
STATE
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF
APPEALS
DISTRICT IV
RICKY R. HENRY, JR.,
(a minor)
by his Guardian ad
Litem,
ROBERT P. VANDEHEY,
and
CAROL M. HENRY, as
Personal
Representative of the
Estate of Ricky R.
Henry, Sr.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF PLATTEVILLE,
a Municipal
Corporation,
Defendant-Respondent,
JASON R. ROLING,
Defendant,
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL
CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant-Respondent,
GRANT COUNTY and
WAUSAU UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
APPEAL from a judgment
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: JOHN R. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed.
Before Eich, C.J.,
Dykman, P.J., and Vergeront, J.
PER
CURIAM. Ricky Henry, Jr., and Carol Henry, on behalf of the
estate of Ricky Henry, Sr., appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their
wrongful death claim against the City of Platteville and its insurer and an
order denying their motion for reconsideration. Henry, Sr., was killed when the car in which he was a passenger
crashed during a pursuit by a Platteville police officer. The suit was brought against the City for
the officer's alleged negligence in initiating and continuing the pursuit. Because recent Wisconsin case law holds
officers immune for initiating and continuing vehicle pursuits, we affirm.
Under § 893.80(4), Stats., municipal officers are immune
for the performance of discretionary acts.
Estate of Cavanaugh v. Andrade, 202 Wis.2d 290, 315, 550
N.W.2d 103, 113 (1996). In Cavanaugh,
the supreme court held that an officer's decision to initiate or continue a
high-speed chase is discretionary, and that immunity is lost only if the injury
results from the officer's failure to exercise due regard while physically
operating his or her vehicle during the pursuit. Id. at 317-19, 550 N.W.2d at 114-15. The Henrys, however, did not allege, or
produce any evidence showing, that the accident was caused by the officer's
failure to physically operate his vehicle with due care. He and the City of Platteville, as his
employer, are therefore immune. Our
decision makes it unnecessary to address the other issues raised on appeal
pertaining to negligence, causation and damages.
By the Court.—Judgment
and order affirmed.
This opinion will not be
published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.