COURT OF APPEALS

                DECISION

   DATED AND RELEASED

 

               May 16, 1996

 

 

 

 

                  NOTICE

 

A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals.  See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats.

This opinion is subject to further editing.  If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports.

 

 

 

 

No.  95-0912

 

STATE OF WISCONSIN               IN COURT OF APPEALS

     DISTRICT IV           

                                                                                                                       

STATE OF WISCONSIN,

 

                                                            Plaintiff-Respondent,

 

                        v.

 

JAMES KENNEDY,

 

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                                                                                                                      

 

 

                        APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County:  PETER G. PAPPAS, Judge.  Affirmed.

                        Before Gartzke, P.J., Dykman and Sundby, JJ.

                        PER CURIAM.   James Kennedy appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial.  The issue is whether Kennedy is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.  We conclude that Kennedy has not established his right to a new trial by clear and convincing evidence.  Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order.

                        The trial court applied the proper legal standards to the relevant facts and reached the correct decision.  Therefore, we incorporate the trial court's memorandum decision and affirm its order.[1]  See Wis. Ct. App. IOP VI (5)(a) (June 13, 1994) (court of appeals may adopt the trial court's opinion).

                        By the Court.—Order affirmed.

                        This opinion will not be published.  See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.


                   AN EXHIBIT HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO THIS OPINION.  THE EXHIBIT CAN BE OBTAINED UNDER SEPARATE COVER BY CONTACTING THE WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS. 

 

 

 

    COURT OF APPEALS

OF WISCONSIN

ROOM 231, STATE CAPITOL EAST

POST OFFICE BOX 1688

          MADISON, WISCONSIN   53701-1688

    TELEPHONE:  (608) 266-1880

FAX:  (608) 267-0640

 

Marilyn L. Graves, Clerk

 Court of Appeals



     [1]  The trial court incorrectly noted that the victim was fifteen when she testified.  Her age was fourteen years, ten months.  Kennedy asserts that she was thirteen when she reported the alleged assaults and ten when they allegedly occurred.  We conclude that the trial court's factual error is immaterial on the issue of sexual knowledge.  Our conclusion may have been different had the victim been age five or six.