COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2010 A.
John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals |
|
NOTICE |
|
|
This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. |
|
Appeal No. |
|
|||
STATE OF |
IN COURT OF APPEALS |
|||
|
DISTRICT I |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
State of Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Darius Defendant-Appellant. |
||||
|
|
|||
APPEAL
from an order of the circuit court for
Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ.
¶1 PER CURIAM. Darius Jennings, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08).[1] He contends that his direct appeal rights should be reinstated and that appellate counsel should be appointed for him because his waiver of counsel during his direct appeal was invalid. We affirm.
¶2 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal or
in a previous Wis. Stat. § 974.06 … postconviction motion is barred from
being raised in a subsequent § 974.06 postconviction motion, absent a
sufficient reason.” State v. Lo, 2003 WI 107,
¶2, 264
By the Court.—Order affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5.