COURT OF APPEALS

DECISION

DATED AND FILED

 

December 28, 2005

 

Cornelia G. Clark

Clerk of Court of Appeals

 

 

 

NOTICE

 

 

This opinion is subject to further editing.  If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. 

 

A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals.  See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62. 

 

 

 

 

Appeal No. 

2004AP806

Cir. Ct. No.  1998CV9535

STATE OF WISCONSIN   

IN COURT OF APPEALS

 

DISTRICT I

 

 

 

 

Robert Pasko, Scott Warren,

Michael Wolfgram, Elizabeth

Pridmore-Dahlke, Patrick Labelle,

Gertie Gilliam, Terese Ulickey,

Henry Zimmerman, Anna Merhalski,

Alfonso Salinas, Richard Thompson,

Jean Docter, Charlene Guiliani,

Harold Davis, David Granica,

Audrey Warren, Mary Sikora,

Linda Scholler, Joseph Suttle,

Vicki Kakonis, Jeanne Sirna,

Timothy Ridgway, Pamela Holmes,

and the Milwaukee Police Association,

 

                        Plaintiffs-Respondents,

 

            v.

 

City of Milwaukee, Board of Fire

and Police Commissioners City of

Milwaukee, Milwaukee Employes'

Retirement System and Annuity and

Pension Board and Milwaukee Police Chief

Arthur Jones in his official capacity,

 

                        Defendants,

 

Association of Law Enforcement

Allied Services Personnel,

Local 218, IUPA and AFL-CIO,

 

                        Intervening Defendants-

                        Appellants.

 

 

 

 

            APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County:  Maxine A. White, Judge.  Dismissed. 

            Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ.

1                        PER CURIAM.   The intervening defendants, Association of Law Enforcement Allied Services Personnel, Local 218 (“Association”), and the defendants, City of Milwaukee, and related entities and individuals (collectively referred to as the “City”) appeal from an order denying a writ of mandamus without prejudice and granting a declaratory judgment to plaintiffs Robert Pasko and twenty-two other members of the Milwaukee Police Department (collectively referred to as “Pasko”), and the Milwaukee Police Association regarding the City’s violation of a collective bargaining agreement.  Pasko and the City, which has since voluntarily dismissed its appeal, have fully resolved the dispute, which was the subject of this action.  Therefore, we dismiss the Association’s appeal as moot. 

                        By the Court.—Appeal dismissed.

            This opinion will not be published.  See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5 (2003-04).