COURT OF
APPEALS DECISION DATED AND
RELEASED June
13, 1996 |
NOTICE |
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an
adverse decision by the Court of Appeals.
See § 808.10 and Rule
809.62, Stats. |
This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the bound
volume of the Official Reports. |
No. 95-3375
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN
COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT IV
STATE
OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
CURTIS
J. MAHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: RICHARD J. CALLAWAY, Judge.
Affirmed.
EICH,
C.J.[1] Curtis Maher, appealing from a judgment
finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated (first offense), argues that
the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution bars his
prosecution for the charge once he has incurred an administrative suspension of
his operator's license under § 343.305, Stats.[2]
We
rejected the identical argument in State v. McMaster, 198 Wis.2d
542, 552-53, 543 N.W.2d 499, 503 (Ct. App. 1995), as we do here.
By
the Court.—Judgment affirmed.
This
opinion will not be published. See
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats.