No.   95-0298

 

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

     DISTRICT IV           

                                                                                                                       

FRED J. PERRI,

 

                                                            Plaintiff-Appellant,

 

                        v.                                                                                 ERRATA SHEET

 

DIOCESE OF LA CROSSE,

 

                                                            Defendant-Respondent.

                                                                                                                      

 

 

Marilyn L. Graves

Clerk of Court of Appeals

231 East, State Capitol

Madison, WI   53701

Peg Carlson

Chief Staff Attorney

119 Martin Luther King Blvd.

Madison, WI  53703

 

Court of Appeals District I

633 W. Wisconsin Ave., Suite 1400

Milwaukee, WI   53203-1918

Court of Appeals District II

2727 N. Grandview Blvd., Suite 300

Waukesha, WI   53188-1672

 

Court of Appeals District III

740 Third Street

Wausau, WI   54403-5784

Court of Appeals District IV

119 Martin Luther King Blvd.

Madison, WI  53703

 

Jennifer Krapf

Administrative Assistant

119 Martin Luther King Blvd.

Madison, WI  53703

 

Hon. Peter G. Pappas

La Crosse County Courthouse

400 North Fourth Street

La Crosse, WI 54601

 

Farrel A. Deml

Trial Court Clerk

La Crosse Co. Courthouse

400 North Fourth Street

La Crosse, WI 54601

James G. Birnbaum

Davis, Birnbaum, Marcou,

  Seymour & Colgan

P.O. Box 1297

La Crosse, WI 54602-1297

 

William P. Skemp

William Skemp Law Firm

P.O. Box 397

La Crosse, WI 54602-0397

 

 

 

 

 

                        PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached page 9 is to be substituted for page 9 in the above-captioned opinion which was released on November 30, 1995.

                        Dated this 28th day of December, 2006.

 


concluded, in order to protect the free exercise of religion,[1] which  prevailed over the compelling governmental interest to eradicate discrimination.  Id. at ___, 538 N.W.2d at 596.

                        In Jocz, we adopted this test for determining if an employment position is ministerial or ecclesiastical:

As a general rule, if the employee's primary duties consist of teaching, spreading the faith, church governance, supervision of a religious order, or supervision or participation in religious ritual and worship, he or she should be considered "ministerial or ecclesiastical."  While this test is not meant to provide the exclusive definition of "ministerial" or "ecclesiastical" functions, it should provide a basic framework for reviewing agencies or courts to follow when addressing the prima facie question of whether a position is entitled to constitutional protection from state interference.

Id. at ___, 538 N.W.2d at 598 (citation omitted).

                        We concluded that Jocz's position with the Sacred Heart School of Theology was a ministerial or ecclesiastical position.  The Sacred Heart School of Theology educated priest-candidates for the Roman Catholic Church.  The Field Education program, which Jocz directed, was governed by church norms, religious



     [1]  In Jocz v. LIRC, ___ Wis.2d ___, 538 N.W.2d 588 (Ct. App. 1995), we looked to the federal religion-clause cases in interpreting both the First Amendment and article I, section 18 of the state constitution, following King v. Village of Waunakee, 185 Wis.2d 25, 55, 517 N.W.2d 671, 684 (1994).