No.   96-3308

 

 

STATE OF WISCONSIN

IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT IV

 

 

In re the Marriage of:

 

Janell S.,

 

                        Petitioner-Appellant,

 

            v.

 

J.R.S.,

 

                        Respondent-Respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ERRATA SHEET

 

 


Marilyn L. Graves
Clerk of Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 1688
Madison, WI   53701-1688

 

Court of Appeals District I
633 W. Wisconsin Ave., #1400
Milwaukee, WI   53203-1918

 

Court of Appeals District III
740 Third Street
Wausau, WI   54403-5784

 

Jennifer Krapf
Administrative Assistant
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Madison, WI  53703

 


Peg Carlson
Chief Staff Attorney
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Madison, WI  53703

 

Court of Appeals District II
2727 N. Grandview Blvd.
Waukesha, WI   53188-1672

 

Court of Appeals District IV
119 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Madison, WI  53703

 

Hon. Robert W. Radcliffe

Jackson County Courthouse

307 Main Street

Black River Falls, WI 54615-1776

 


Claudia J. Singleton

T.C.# 90 FA 1

Jackson County Courthouse

307 Main Street

Black River Falls, WI 54615-1776

 

Timothy Osicka

308 Grand Avenue

Wausau, WI 54403

 

Kathleen C. Mann

115 Fifth Ave. S., #304

La Crosse, WI 54602-2623

 

Gerald R. Fox

P.O. Box 512

Black River Falls, WI 54615


 

                        PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attached page 10 is to be substituted for page 10 in the above-captioned opinion which was released on October 2, 1997.

                        Dated this 3rd day of October, 1997.


outcome on retrial would be different.  See Vollmer v. Luety, 156 Wis.2d 1, 19, 456 N.W.2d 797, 805 (1990). 

                        Janell asks that we order a retrial before a different judge.  We decline to do so.  There is no reason to believe that she cannot receive a fair hearing and enough time to adequately present the testimony she believes will prove her position.  A trial judge’s unhappiness with counsel’s method of presenting a case is not a reason to assume bias.  Judges are people too, and cannot be expected to be pleased with all attorneys.  But this case is not about counsel; it is about Jake. 

                        No costs to either party.

                        By the Court.—Order reversed and cause remanded with directions. 

                        Not recommended for publication in the official reports.